Trendi Marketing / Public search visibility case study

Thompson Law: Dallas SEO & Search Visibility

A look at Thompson Law’s search presence through historical keyword rankings, a Dallas competitive comparison, and a dated local-search snapshot.

Published October 3, 2026 · Domain: 1800lionlaw.com · Sources: Semrush and AccuRanker

2,540Keywords in positions 1–10
Semrush · September 2026
467Keywords in positions 1–3
Semrush · September 2026
40.43%Dallas campaign visibility
Semrush · October 3, 2026 report

A longer view of search visibility

A useful SEO case study identifies what was measured and when. The historical Semrush snapshots below compare the same domain in July 2018 and September 2026. They show a substantial expansion in the keywords for which Semrush recorded prominent organic positions.

Historical organic keyword rankings
Ranking band July 2018 September 2026
Positions 1–3 13 467
Positions 4–10 18 2,073
Positions 1–10 combined 31 2,540

Source: Semrush historical domain research screenshots, captured October 3, 2026. Top-10 counts combine the 1–3 and 4–10 bands. These are keywords observed in the tool’s database, not an exhaustive count of every search. Database coverage and search results can change over time.

The September 2026 top-10 count is approximately 82 times the July 2018 count. This is a comparison of two snapshots, not a claim of uninterrupted growth or a controlled measurement attributing every change to one activity.

Dallas visibility in a competitive market

The Dallas desktop tracking report places Thompson Law ahead of the selected comparison domains below. Its visibility score describes performance within a defined keyword campaign.

Dallas desktop campaign: 124 tracked keywords
Domain Visibility
1800lionlaw.com 40.43%
superlawyers.com 12.36%
thomasjhenrylaw.com 8.98%
benabbott.com 2.98%
justia.com 1.08%

Source: Semrush Position Tracking screenshot captured October 3, 2026. Google · Dallas, Texas · desktop · English. Selected report range: July 1–October 3, 2026. Values are the displayed endpoint scores, not averages over the range. These are selected comparison domains, not the entire market.

Visibility is a third-party score, not a percentage of all Dallas searches, website visits, or cases. This comparison documents the observed competitive position; it does not claim that visibility increased throughout the selected period.

A closer look at “Dallas car accident lawyer”

AccuRanker’s October 3, 2026 export records Thompson Law’s car-accident page at rank 1 for the mobile Google search “dallas car accident lawyer,” checked in Dallas, Texas. The same export records the firm’s local listing at local-pack position 1 on desktop for that query.

These are two separate observations: a mobile website result and a desktop local listing. They should not be combined into a claim that every searcher sees Thompson Law first.

Source: AccuRanker top-100 results export dated October 3, 2026 · Google · Dallas, TX, USA. Mobile website URL: Thompson Law’s Dallas car accident lawyer page. Local position uses the export’s local-pack rank field. Results vary by device, location, time, and search context.

Local SEO / Google local-pack results

Local search visibility across five Texas markets

Local listings provide another way for people to find a law firm in their city. The selected observations below show Thompson Law in the top three local-pack positions for specific searches in Dallas, Arlington, Garland, McKinney, and Waco.

Selected Google local-pack rankings · October 3, 2026
Search keyword Search location Device Local position
dallas car accident lawyer Dallas, TX Desktop #1
dallas personal injury lawyer Dallas, TX Desktop #1
arlington car accident lawyer Arlington, TX Desktop #2
garland personal injury lawyer Garland, TX Mobile #1
mckinney car accident lawyer McKinney, TX Mobile #1
waco car accident lawyer Waco, TX Desktop #2

Source: AccuRanker keyword export with observation date October 3, 2026. Values use the Local Pack Rank field. Search engine: Google. Each search was checked in the listed city. These are selected results, not a summary of all tracked keywords or locations.

These positions refer to Google’s local listings, separately from organic website rankings. They describe the recorded search location and device; they are not a geographic grid showing coverage throughout each city. Positions can vary with proximity, time, and search context.

Explore Trendi’s local SEO services, Dallas SEO services, or personal injury law firm marketing to discuss how local visibility fits into your firm’s search strategy.

What this case study demonstrates

Thompson Law’s public search data illustrates the difference between broad keyword coverage, visibility within a specific market, and individual rankings. Each answers a different question. Together, they provide a more useful view than an isolated ranking without a date or location.

This case study is limited to externally observable rankings and third-party visibility metrics. It does not report client analytics, inquiries, signed cases, revenue, or internal campaign information. Historical observations do not guarantee future positions or outcomes for another business.

Methodology references: Semrush organic positions documentation and AccuRanker. The supplied reports are dated snapshots; these links describe the tools rather than reproduce the exact historical reports.

Discuss your firm’s search visibility

Which practice areas and markets matter most to your firm? Talk with Trendi about assessing your website’s search presence and defining a focused SEO plan.

Talk with Trendi